Electronic trading, sometimes called
etrading, is a method of trading
securities (such as
stocks, and
bonds),
foreign exchange or
financial derivatives electronically.
Information technology is used to bring together buyers and sellers through an
electronic trading platform and network to create virtual market places such as
NASDAQ,
NYSE Arca and
Globex which are also known as
electronic communications networks (ECNs).
Electronic trading is in contrast to older
floor trading and phone trading and has a number of advantages, but glitches and cancelled trades do still occur.
History
For many years
stock markets
were physical locations where buyers and sellers met and negotiated.
Exchange trading would typically happen on the floor of an exchange,
where traders in brightly colored jackets (to identify which firm they worked for) would shout and gesticulate at one another – a process known as
open outcry or
pit trading
(the exchange floors were often pit-shaped – circular, sloping
downwards to the centre, so that the traders could see one another).
With the improvement in
communications
technology in the late 20th century, the need for a physical location
became less important and traders started to transact from remote
locations in what became know as electronic trading.
Electronic trading made transactions easier to complete, monitor, clear, and settle and this helped spur on its development.
One of the earliest examples of widespread electronic trading was on Globex, the
CME Group’s
electronic trading platform conceived in 1987 and launched fully in 1992.
This allowed access to a variety of financial markets such as
treasuries, foreign exchange and commodities. The
Chicago Board of Trade
(CBOT) produced a rival system that was based on Oak Trading Systems’
Oak platform branded ‘E Open Outcry,’ an electronic trading platform
that allowed for trading to take place alongside that took place in the
CBOT pits.
Set up in 1971,
NASDAQ was the world's first electronic stock market, though it originally operated as an electronic bulletin board
[citation needed], rather than offering
straight-through processing (STP).
By 2011 investment firms on both the
buy side and
sell side were increasing their spending on technology for electronic trading.
With the result that many floor traders and brokers were removed from
the trading process. Traders also increasingly started to rely on
algorithms to analyze market conditions and then execute their orders automatically.
The move to electronic trading compared to floor trading continued to
increase with many of the major exchanges around the world moving from
floor trading to completely electronic trading.
Trading in the financial markets can broadly be split into two groups:
- Business-to-business (B2B) trading, often conducted on exchanges, where large investment banks and brokers trade directly with one another, transacting large amounts of securities, and
- Business-to-consumer
(B2C) trading, where retail (e.g. individuals buying and selling
relatively small amounts of stocks and shares) and institutional clients
(e.g. hedge funds, fund managers or insurance companies, trading far
larger amounts of securities) buy and sell from brokers or "dealers",
who act as middle-men between the clients and the B2B markets.
While the majority of retail trading in the United States happens
over the Internet, retail trading volumes are dwarfed by institutional,
inter-dealer and exchange trading. However, in developing economies,
especially in Asia, retail trading constitutes a significant portion of
overall trading volume.
[citation needed]
For instruments which are not exchange-traded (e.g.
US treasury bonds),
the inter-dealer market substitutes for the exchange. This is where
dealers trade directly with one another or through inter-dealer brokers
(i.e. companies like
GFI Group and
BGC Partners.
They acted as middle-men between dealers such as investment banks).
This type of trading traditionally took place over the phone but brokers
moved to offering electronic trading services instead.
Similarly, B2C trading traditionally happened over the phone and,
while some still does, more brokers are allowing their clients to place
orders using electronic systems. Many retail (or "discount") brokers
(e.g.
Charles Schwab,
E-Trade) went online during the late 1990s and most retail stock-broking probably takes place over the web now.
Larger institutional clients, however, will generally place electronic orders via proprietary
electronic trading platforms such as
Bloomberg Terminal,
Reuters 3000 Xtra,
Thomson Reuters Eikon, BondsPro,
Thomson TradeWeb or
CanDeal (which connect institutional clients to several dealers), or using their brokers' proprietary software.
For stock trading, the process of connecting counterparties through electronic trading is supported by the
Financial Information eXchange
(FIX) Protocol. Used by the vast majority of exchanges and traders, the
FIX Protocol is the industry standard for pre-trade messaging and trade
execution. While the FIX Protocol was developed for trading stocks, it
has been further developed to accommodate commodities,
foreign exchange,
derivatives,
and fixed income
trading.
Impact
The increase of electronic trading has had some important implications:
- Reduced cost of transactions – By automating as much of the process
as possible (often referred to as "straight-through processing" or STP),
costs are brought down. The goal is to reduce the incremental cost of
trades as close to zero as possible, so that increased trading volumes
don't lead to significantly increased costs. This has translated to
lower costs for investors.
- Greater liquidity – electronic systems make it easier to allow
different companies to trade with one another, no matter where they are
located. This leads to greater liquidity (i.e. there are more buyers and
sellers) which increases the efficiency of the markets.
- Greater competition – While electronic trading hasn't necessarily
lowered the cost of entry to the financial services industry, it has
removed barriers within the industry and had a globalisation-style
competition effect. For example, a trader can trade futures on Eurex, Globex or LIFFE at the click of a button – he or she doesn't need to go through a broker or pass orders to a trader on the exchange floor.
- Increased transparency – Electronic trading has meant that the
markets are less opaque. It's easier to find out the price of securities
when that information is flowing around the world electronically.
- Tighter spreads – The "spread" on an instrument is the difference
between the best buying and selling prices being quoted; it represents
the profit being made by the market makers.
The increased liquidity, competition and transparency means that
spreads have tightened, especially for commoditised, exchange-traded
instruments.
For retail investors, financial services on the web offer great
benefits. The primary benefit is the reduced cost of transactions for
all concerned as well as the ease and the convenience.
Web-driven financial transactions bypass traditional hurdles such as
logistics.
Technology and systems
Electronic trading systems are typically proprietary software (
etrading platforms or
electronic trading platforms), running on
COTS hardware and operating systems, often using common underlying protocols, such as
TCP/IP.
Exchanges typically develop their own systems (sometimes referred to
as matching engines), although sometimes an exchange will use another
exchange's technology (e.g. e-cbot, the
Chicago Board of Trade's electronic trading platform, uses
LIFFE's Connect system), and some newer electronic exchanges use 3rd-party specialist software providers (e.g. the
Budapest stock exchange and the
Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange)
use automated trading software originally written and implemented by
FMSC, an Australian technology company that was acquired by
Computershare, and whose intellectual property rights are now owned by
OMX.
Exchanges and ECNs generally offer two methods of accessing their systems –
- an exchange-provided GUI, which the trader runs on his or her desktop and connects directly to the exchange/ECN, and
- an API which allows dealers to plug their own in-house systems directly into the exchange/ECN's.
From an infrastructure point of view, most exchanges will provide
"gateways" which sit on a company's network, acting in a manner similar
to a
proxy, connecting back to the exchange's central system.
ECNs will generally forego the gateway/proxy, and their GUI or the
API will connect directly to a central system, across a leased line.
Many
brokers
develop their own systems, although there are some third-party
solutions providers specializing in this area. Like ECNs, brokers will
often offer both a GUI and an API (although it's likely that a slightly
smaller proportion of brokers offer an API, as compared with ECNs), and
connectivity is typically direct to the broker's systems, rather than
through a gateway.
Investment banks and other dealers have far more complex technology
requirements, as they have to interface with multiple exchanges, brokers
and multi-dealer platforms, as well as their own pricing, P&L,
trade processing and position-keeping systems. Some banks will develop
their own electronic trading systems in-house, but this can be costly,
especially when they need to connect to many exchanges, ECNs and
brokers. There are a number of companies offering solutions in this
area.
Algorithmic trading
Some electronic trades are not planned or executed by human traders, but by complex algorithms.
source : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_trading